Miriam, Moshe, and Water

 

            Chapter twenty of Bamidbar tells of the sin that Moshe committed, which made him unable to lead the Jewish People into the Promised Land. The chapter opens with the death of Miriam, his older sister. The next verse informs us that there was no water for the people, which caused them to gang up against Moshe and Aharon. Rashi (quoting the Gemara in Ta'anit 9a) tells us that there is a connection between these two pieces of information. For forty years the people received water in Miriam's merit. Now that she had passed away, they thirsted, because the well that had provided for them had disappeared.

 

            It is easy to understand the connection between Miriam's merit and the supplying of water. Miriam stood guard when her baby brother, Moshe, floated down the Nile. Her meritorious deed was accomplished by using water, such that the water of the Nile would save the life of her brother. The people whom her brother took out of slavery therefore received water in her merit. When we use nature for the service of God, God sets nature at our service.

 

            There is a closer connection between the issues. Ultimately, these people were saved because of Miriam. By using water in the service of God, she made her brother's mission, as a leader, possible. In the same way, his mission was always made possible through her merit. For her sake, water was supplied to the people in the desert, without which Moses would not have been able to lead them there for forty years.

 

            This idea follows throughout the narrative, and opens a window into understanding fundamental issues later in the chapter. It was because of a lack of water that the people rose against Moshe and Aharon. God commanded them to speak to a rock, and when they hit it twice, and it still gave water, they were told that they had sinned - presumably, in diverting from the particular command. Not only was Moshe's mission hindered by the lack of water, by the lack of his sister's merit, but his whole leadership was challenged, and ultimately his mission was curtailed.

 

            Miriam saved her baby brother's life. Her merit was always with him, his success always related to it. The water, made by her to save his life as an infant, stood by him always, in her merit. The fact that the people had water throughout their wanderings made his mission possible. As soon as this merit was lost, his mission was subject to the threat held off by that merit - the challenge of leadership over people without water. The complexity of the issue is remarkable. There is a direct correspondence, on several levels, between the nature of the valorous act performed, and its projected implications over time.

Courtesy of Yeshivat Har Etzion - www.etzion.org.il

Volver al capítulo

שיר חדש ישן

 

מזמורנו מופיע כמעט מילה במילה, עם שינויים קלים בדברי הימים א ט"ז, כג-לג. שם המזמור מובא בהקשר של העלאת הארון לירושלים על ידי דוד: "ויביאו את ארון הא-להים ויציגו אתו בתוך האהל אשר נטה לו דויד... ויכל דויד מהעלות העלה והשלמים ויברך את העם בשם ה'" (שם, א-ב).

השינוי הגדול ביותר שיש בין מזמורנו ובין המזמור שם הוא: אצלנו כתוב "הוד והדר לפניו עז ותפארת במקדשו" (ו) ואילו בדברי הימים כתוב: "הוד והדר לפניו עז וחדוה במקומו" (דב"א ט"ז, כז). ושינוי נוסף, אצלנו כתוב: "הבו לה' כבוד שמו שאו מנחה ובאו לחצרותיו" (ח) ואילו בדברי הימים כתוב: "הבו לה' כבוד שמו שאו מנחה ובאו לפניו" (דב"א ט"ז, כט). כלומר בדברי הימים אין זכר למקדש שאצלנו מופיע פעמיים.

בפשטות ניתן לענות שההקשר שהמזמור נטוע בו בדברי הימים לא מאפשר לדבר על המקדש, שהרי בימי דוד המקדש עדיין לא היה בנוי ולכן המחבר לא מעוניין ליצור אנכרוניזם בטקסט. אפשר לומר כך וזוהי בהחלט דרך לפתרון (וכך גם נוקט עמוס חכם בפירושו). אני חושב שאפשר להוסיף ולומר ששינוי נוסף הוא שהמזמור אצלנו נפתח ב"שירו לה' שיר חדש" (א) בניגוד לדברי הימים ששם לא מוזכר השיר החדש. ייתכן והמזמור שלנו לא סתם גורס "שיר חדש" – השיר שלנו שמזכיר את המקדש, שייך לימים שהמקדש כבר נבנה והוא "מתקן" את המזמור הקדום שהמקדש לא מוזכר בו כלל. 

Volver al capítulo

תיקון העולם

Volver al capítulo

יודו לה' חסדו

 

"יוֹדוּ לַה' חַסְדּוֹ וְנִפְלְאוֹתָיו לִבְנֵי אָדָם
 כִּי הִשְׂבִּיעַ נֶפֶשׁ שׁוֹקֵקָה וְנֶפֶשׁ רְעֵבָה מִלֵּא טוֹב
" (ח-ט)


לחן: הרב מנדל פולק   ביצוע: להקת שיר דברי

Volver al capítulo

שירו לו זמרו לו

 

"שִׁירוּ לוֹ זַמְּרוּ לוֹ שִׂיחוּ בְּכָל נִפְלְאֹתָיו" (ב)

Volver al capítulo

Korach: Power Outage!

The lust for power can destroy a person. It is amazing how people who are otherwise very competent are blinded to reality when the smell of power is in the air. We need look no further than the central character of this week's parsha, KorachAs our Rabbis tell us (see Rashi Bamidbar 16:7), Korach was a smart man. What did he think he would gain by trying to oust Moshe and Aharon? Did he really think he would be successful? 

Korach waited for the opportune time to challenge the leadership of his first cousins. The Jews had just been told that they were to die in the desert. Upon hearing this news, there was a movement to appoint a new leader and return to Egypt. They were about to stone Yehoshua and Calev for even suggesting that they could conquer Israel. If ever Moshe could be deposed it was now. Korach, the great opportunist, tried to seize the moment for his own personal glory. 

Unfortunately, Korach's desire for leadership did not stem from a genuine belief that he could do an equal or better job of serving the people of Israel. The Rabbis (see Rashi Bamidbar 16:1) teach that it was jealousy, pure and simple, that drove his mutiny. Korach was upset that Aharon and his descendants were designated Kohanim, whereas he and his descendants were Levi'im who ‘only’ aided the Kohanim. When another younger cousin of his, Elitzafan ben Uziel was appointed to head the family of Kehat, Korach was outraged. 

Instead of graciously accepting the fact that Moshe's appointment reflected the Divine will, Korach's true nature was revealed. If he could not lead, then everyone would suffer, he mused. Of course, Korach was more subtle than that, attracting followers by stating that "the entire community is holy" (16:13). While this statement is unquestionably true it is misleading. We may all be holy, but we are not all the same. Not everyone can or should be a leader: less "holy" people must defer to more "holy" people. 

Korach attracted a diverse group to join his entourage, each with their own personal grievance. Those descended from Reuven claimed that the tribe of Leviincluding Moshe and Aharon, had usurped their position. As the descendents of the eldest of the twelve sons of Yaakov, they demanded a leadership role. Elders among various tribes felt that they too were entitled to positions of leadership. And "the men of rank in the community" felt that hereditary pedigree should play no role in the choice of a leader, that only individual character traits should be the determining factor. While each group had some element of truth to their grievances, their motivation was insincere and hence doomed to failure. 

It is Korach and his followers who are described (Avot 5:17) as the prime example of a controversy "not for the sake of heaven, which will not have fulfillment”.

In an "argument for the sake of heaven" both sides are united in purpose, both wish to implement the Divine will. There may be disagreement but ultimately both sides are working together. In an argument "not for the sake of heaven" (and unfortunately most,more likey all, disagreements today fall into this category) the unity is lost as each person has their own personal agenda. Their joining together may serve their purposes now, but when their union ceases to be useful to them, infighting is bound to occur. What starts as a mutiny against others soon turns into a mutinous group of malcontents. 

It is for this reason the Mishna defines this controversy as one between Korach and his followers and not, as we would have expected, between Korach, his followers and Moshe. While there was controversy directed at Moshe, he took had no part in perpetuating it. Had Korach succeeded the real fighting would have begun with so many vying to be the leader. 

Acting for the sake of heaven is a most difficult task. It requires strength of character and conviction, the ability to withstand social pressure and most of all humility. It is no coincidence that the greatest leader, Moshe Rabbeinu, is described by the Torah as one who was “exceedingly humble” (Bamidbar12:3). May we merit emulating his example if not for our sake, then for the sake of peace. 

 Courtesy of Torah in Motion - www.torahinmotion.org
Volver al capítulo

ח

Volver al capítulo

מלכות ה' בעולם

Volver al capítulo

עולם מתוקן

Volver al capítulo

ה' תמיד איתך

Volver al capítulo

Pages

x

Lee el Tanaj cómodamente. ¡Instala nuestra App en tu pantalla de inicio!

📲 Instala nuestra App

Toca el botón de Compartir (el icono de un cuadrado con una flecha hacia arriba) en la barra de Safari, desliza hacia abajo y selecciona 'Agregar a la pantalla de inicio'.