Potential solutions for understanding Hananya, Misha’el and Azarya’s actions in contrast with the general behavior of the Jews at their time include: the permissibility as an act of piety to give up one’s life even if no obligation exists; the obligation to give up one’s life if the action is part of a decree to destroy one’s faith even if the action itself is not idol worship; and the obligation of leaders to give up their lives for an action that can be perceived as idol worship. The permissibility to give up one’s life if the idol worship is for the ruler’s honor and not a question of faith as Mordekhai did in the case of Haman is up for debate amongst the Sages both in the book of Daniel, and in the case of Mordekhai.

Courtesy of the Virtual Beit Midrash, Yeshivat Har Etzion