במערה תפילה

 

מזמורי "מַשְׂכִּיל לְדָוִד" בספר תהלים (לב, מא, נב, נג, נד, נה, קמב)  הם מזמורי זעקה יוצאי דופן. גם במזמורי אסף (עד ו-עח) ואיתן האזרחי (פט) יש זעקה קשה, אבל על רקע היסטורי; במזמורי דוד, הזעקה היא אישית – פעמיים (לב, מא) מתוך הכרה בחטא, וחמש פעמים (נב עד נה, קמב), מתוך המרדפים במדבר יהודה, ההלשנות של הזיפים וההתנכרות של נבל, ומתוך הבריחה למערה, בתחושה של כמעט אבדן.

שונים מאד הם מזמורי "מַשְׂכִּיל לִבְנֵי קֹרַח" (מב עד מה, וגם מז), שהם שירי התבוננות וזיכרון על גילוי מלכות ה' בעולם, ובמיוחד בהיכלו, אבל אפשר לגלות גם בהם את שפל הגלות, ממנה בקעו שירים מופלאים אלה. בכל מקרה, ה"מַשְׂכִּיל" המקראי דורש את ה' בשירה.

התפילה, שנזכרה במזמור הקודם (קמא), עליה נאמר – "תִּכּוֹן תְּפִלָּתִי קְטֹרֶת לְפָנֶיךָ, מַשְׂאַת כַּפַּי מִנְחַת עָרֶב", נשמעת במלוא זעקתה במזמור זה (קמב). הבריחה של דוד ואנשיו למערה באזור עין גדי "עַל פְּנֵי צוּרֵי הַיְּעֵלִים", נבעה מתוך רגע של משבר חמור, כי ליד "הַסֶּלַע... בְּמִדְבַּר מָעוֹן" כמעט נתפסו דוד ואנשיו.

"וַיֵּלֶךְ שָׁאוּל מִצַּד הָהָר, מִזֶּה, וְדָוִד וַאֲנָשָׁיו מִצַּד הָהָר, מִזֶּה; וַיְהִי דָוִד נֶחְפָּז לָלֶכֶת, מִפְּנֵי שָׁאוּל, וְשָׁאוּל וַאֲנָשָׁיו עֹטְרִים (=מקיפים כמו עטרה) אֶל דָּוִד וְאֶל אֲנָשָׁיו, לְתָפְשָׂם" (שמואל א כג, כו); זה קרה "בְּמִדְבַּר מָעוֹן, בָּעֲרָבָה, אֶל יְמִין (=דרום) הַיְשִׁימוֹן" (שם, כד), כאשר אנשי זיף ונבל הכרמלי עשו יד אחת עם שאול כדי לחסל את דוד ואנשיו. (הזעקה "הַבֵּיט יָמִין וּרְאֵה... אָבַד מָנוֹס מִמֶּנִּי" מתקשרת בדיוק "אֶל יְמִין הַיְשִׁימוֹן", כנראה מקום שומם במיוחד, מדרום לסלע אשר "בְּמִדְבַּר מָעוֹן").

דוד היה על סף התהום בבורחו למערה, וכמעט "נִפְזְרוּ עֲצָמֵינוּ לְפִי שְׁאוֹל", מתוך מצב זה בקעה התפילה במערה, והיא משלימה את הסיפור במדויק.


באדיבות אתר 929

Volver al capítulo

לא להיגרר לשיטות הרֶשַע

 

ההשפעה הקשה ביותר של חבורות הרֶשַע וארגוני הטרור והפֶּשַע היא שהם גוררים אחריהם רבים וטובים לאותן השיטות ולאותו הרוע בגלל ההכרח להתגונן. לנגד עינינו אנו רואים איך ארגוני טרור קיצוניים גוררים מדינות שלמות למלחמות שלא חלמו עליהן ולא רצו בהן, וברור שאין מלחמות סטריליות, גם אם משתדלים למעט ברוע ככל האפשר.

בתפילה מיוחדת, שהלוואי ותתקבל לפני ה' כמו מנחה וקטורת, מבקש דוד הנרדף הצלה מאת ה', בלי להיגרר אחרי עלילות הרֶשַע, בלי לנהל מערכה נגדית בתחבולות דומות – בלי להרוג את שאול, המלך הרודף אחריו, אפילו ברגע שזה היה קל, ונראה כמזומן משמים – במערה, ובלילה (שמואל א כ"ד וכ"ו), אלא להישאר פסיבי, לנהל מודיעין רק לשם בריחה, ולשם מאמץ פסיכולוגי – כריתת כנף המעיל, ולקיחת החנית וצפחת המים – ולחסות רק בה'.

גדולתו של דוד הגיעה לשיאה דווקא שם – במערה, כשעצר בתוקף את אנשיו מלשלוח יד במלך שאול, ולסיים את הפחד ואת הבריחה במכת מחץ אחת, שנראה כאילו היא ממש מאת ה'. להישאר צדיק נרדף במצב כזה, מי עוד יכול?!

מרתק משחק המילים 'מלחמה' ו'לחם' ('לחם' משמעו גם בשר, כמו בקרבנות, "לֶחֶם אִשֶּה") – יש כאן רמז לסעודות מלכים בהן חותכים לחם, ובו בזמן מתכננים מזימות ועלילות מלחמה נגד יריב נרדף כדוד, המתחנן לא להשתתף בסעודות כאלה – "וּבַל אֶלְחַם בְּמַנְעַמֵּיהֶם".

מדהימים הרמזים למלך שָׁאוּל, שכמעט תפס את דוד "בְּמִדְבַּר מָעוֹן" ליד "סֶלַע הַמַּחְלְקֹת" (שמואל א כ"ג, כה-כח), אך נשמט ממנו בגלל התקפה פלִשתית. אחרי שכמעט פיזר את עצמות דוד ואנשיו "לְפִי שְׁאוֹל", במדבר יהודה, זה בדיוק מה שקרה לו ולבניו בהר הגלבוע, ולגופותיהם המוקעות "בְּחוֹמַת בֵּית שָׁן" (=בית שאן; שמואל א ל"א, ח-י).


באדיבות אתר 929

Volver al capítulo

תיכון תפילתי קטורת לפניך

Volver al capítulo

Shoftim: Intellectual Honesty

Judaism has always placed tremendous emphasis on intellectual achievement and development. Talmud Torah k’neged kulam—the study of Torah is equal to all other mitzvoth—speaks to this emphasis. Our Sages teach that, "An ignorant person cannot be pious” (Avot 2:6).  

The Torah expects every Jew, young or old, poor or wealthy, man or woman, married or single, to study Torah each and every day. Whereas for most people, their main service of G-d will be expressed in a variety of other ways—the understanding and appreciation of the beauty of G-d' s universe, the study of science, literature or psychology, acts of chesed, prayer, integrity in our monetary dealings—Torah study remains the highest expression of understanding of the Divine will. One of the primary causes of the vehement opposition to the founding of the Chassidic movement was the suggestion that prayer and learning were of equal importance.   

Effective Torah study requires intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, fierce independence, and a fearless desire to search for the truth at any cost. Rav Moshe Feinstein, zt"l, in his beautiful introduction to his Responsa, Iggort Moshe, notes that he disagreed with many earlier authorities whom he considered much greater than himself. Rav Moshe points out that this is not only allowed, it is mandated, as the search for truth defers to G-d alone—and even there, as the "Torah is not in heaven". It is man alone who may issue Torah rulings (see Baba Metzia 59b).

While those who are able to argue with the greats of the past in the practical implementation of Jewish law are very few and far between, all are still mandated to critically study the rulings of our great authorities, never ceasing to question and analyze their decisions and reasoning. This is the way of Torah. At times, questions may lead to refinement or even rejection of previously accepted positions; and at times, similar questions may be left unanswered, bearing no practical significance. 

It is the fierce independent-mindedness of the Jewish people through time that has led to so much controversy in so many areas of life.  Today, we unfortunately lack a Sanhedrin, a supreme court, able to rule on difficult and controversial matters, leaving them unresolved. Such uncertainty, however, was not meant to be. 

"If there arise a matter too hard for you in judgment between blood and blood, between plea and plea, between plague and plague, matters of controversy within your community; then you shall arise and go to the place that the Lord shall choose" (Devarim 17:8). The Torah, in delineating the role of the Sanhedrin, goes on to explain that one must follow the ruling of the Supreme Court, even if, as the Rashi quoting the Sifri, comments, "it appears they tell you right is left and left is right".  

"And the man who rebels and refuses…then that man must be put to death" (Devarim 17:12). A system of law loses all authority if the rulings of the Supreme Court are flouted, causing anarchy and national chaos. Thus, the Torah takes a very hard line, calling for the death penalty for such defiance. While our tradition allowed the death penalty only for a member of the Sanhedrin defying his own court's ruling, referring to him as the zaken mamreh, the rebellious elder, the language of the Torah discussing the case of  "the [plain] man" makes it clear that all must defer to the authority of the law, as defined by its greatest scholars. 

However, while one may legislate action, one may not attempt to control another's mind. The dissenting judge may—and perhaps, even should—continue to express his opinion that the members of the Supreme Court erred, and that he believes their decision to be wrong. Only when he crosses the line by telling people to defy the ruling and actually act against the high court does he forfeit his right to life, as he is undermining the basis of society.  

Such is the intellectual honesty the Torah expects of us, requiring us to express what we feel to be correct, even in the face of disagreement from the greatest minds of the generation. And such is the societal norm demanded of us, insisting that no matter how wrong we may think others to be, the rule of law must be respected. This tension between thought and action is ennobling, allowing us to grow as we search and struggle to live our lives "according to the law which they shall teach you" (Devarim 17:11). 

Courtesy of Torah in Motion - www.torahinmotion.org

Volver al capítulo

Re'eh: A Special Place

The land of Israel is a special, holy land and thus, all produce grown on it has properties of holiness. This is the underpinning of such laws of terumah, ma’aser, bikurim, challah, shmitah and yovel. Unfortunately, many of us see the main distinction between life in Israel and in the Diaspora in relation to the laws of agriculture. We often lose sight of the fact that it is only in Israel where all of the mitzvoth of the Torah can be put into practice, where we can have a true national identity and be a light onto the nations. It is the seat of the Sanhedrin; and in fact semichah, rabbinic ordination, can only be given in the land of Israel (the ordination that we call semichah today is in reality only a certificate of competence and does not allow us to judge criminal or capital law). Torah must emanate from Israel. 

Yet in addition to agriculture and the symbols and rights of national sovereignty, there appears to be another key aspect of Jewish life that can only be fully attained in the land of Israel. I am referring to fear of G-d. “You shall surely tithe all the produce of your seed that comes forth from the field in the course of the year. You must eat this before G-d, your Lord, in the place that he will choose as dedicated to His name… that you shall learn to fear the Lord, your G-d, for all time” (Devarim 14:22-23). The Torah here describes the mitzvah of ma’aser sheni, the second tithe. The Torah obligates the Jewish farmer living in Israel to take just under 10% of his produce and either eat the food or spend the monetary equivalent plus a 25% fee in Jerusalem, four years out of every seven. What, however, is the connection between the consumption of cattle, sheep, wine and oil and the fear of G-d?

Apparently, the city of Jerusalem instils a fear of G-d, as we are closer to G-d in both a literal and a figurative sense. Seeing the Temple service, meeting scores of scholars, viewing the Sanhedrin with its religious and intellectual leadership, being with multitudes of other Jews, the emphasis on spirituality and basking in the Divine presence combine to inspire us to reach up to G-d. 

It is a basic tenet of Judaism that without Torah study, one cannot be a truly pious, G-d-fearing person. “An ignorant person cannot be a pious one”, our Sages teach (Pirkei Avot 2:7). Without Torah knowledge, one cannot comprehend the demands that G-d has placed upon us. Furthermore, as the Torah is actually a description of G-d Himself, its study leads to knowledge of G-d and thereby inspires us to fear Him. The Netziv, the illustrious 19th century Lithuanian scholar, explains that the bringing of ma’aser sheni to Jerusalem will, by definition, lead to increased Torah study. As it is inconceivable that one could eat ten percent of one’s produce over the holiday period, two options presented themselves. One could extend his stay in Jerusalem where, in addition to its natural inspirational powers, one would be most likely to spend time in the pursuit of Torah study, having no job to attend to. Alternatively, one whose commitments forced him to return home immediately would have no choice but to leave his ma’aser for the scholars of Jerusalem. Ancient Jerusalem, even more so than the modern city, was a city weak on industry, but the center of intellectual creativity and pursuits. Either through his own study or support of others, Torah study would be increased.

We live in a time where fear of G-d is a foreign concept. While we are often concerned what our friends and colleagues will think of our actions, we seem less concerned about G-d’s attitude. When was the last time you asked yourself, what would G-d say about our actions? Imagine how different we would all act if we yearned to fear G-d at all times. The Torah tells us that even in the eating of food, we can learn how to fear G-d.  

Courtesy of Torah in Motion - www.torahinmotion.org

Volver al capítulo

Eikev: The Sweat of Your Brow

Raising an independent nation is no easy task. The generation that left Egypt was (understandably) not up to the task. Whether or not their children would be was something of an open question. Moshe spends almost the entire book of Devarim preparing the people so that their entry into the land is a successful and permanent one. He was undoubtedly worried about what might be; he knew he would not be joining them. The last time Moshe left B'nai Yisrael, they built a golden calf, and much of Sefer Devarim is devoted to the theme of the dangers and enticements of idolatry.

But first they had to conquer the land, a task that looked daunting. "If [when?] You say in your heart these nations are greater than us, how (eicha) will we be able to conquer them?" (7:17). Such fear was natural, and Moshe displays no anger as he assures them that G-d-who performed so many miracles for them-will be there to help them conquer the land.

In Egypt and throughout the sojourn in the desert, G-d's protection came through overt miracles; yet, in the land of Israel, the Jewish people were to live a "natural" existence. B'nai Yisrael, in their infancy, needed G-d's obvious and undeniable presence, so that they (and the Egyptians) could "know G-d". A group of slaves cannot relate to an abstract, distant G-d. Despite the fact that they saw miracles on a daily basis--or perhaps because of it--they were quite fickle in their faith.The miracles of today meant little by tomorrow, and the Jewish people would be unable to develop unless they could wean themselves from the miraculous. True faith can only exist when G-d is hidden behind the veil of nature, history, or tragedy. And nation-building can occur only when the people carry out the work themselves, not by relying on others to do it; even, or especially, if it's G-d.

"We are not to rely on miracles". Instead of manna from heaven and water from a rock, they would have to work the land and wait (and pray) for rain. Their clothes would wear out, and they would need to wear shoes (see 8:4). They would have to find their own way, without clouds of glory leading them. Moshe assures the Jewish people they have little to fear. Yet, as he says over and over again, this divine protection is contingent on the behaviour of the Jewish people. "Lest the sin cause [a negation of G-d's assurances]" is something that worried Yaakov Avinu, and must surely worry all of his descendants.

G-d is ready to protect us, albeit in a different fashion: one that will allow those who do not want to see the hand of G-d in history to do just that. The Torah tells us that conquering the land will take time (it actually took 21 years). "You will not be able to destroy them quickly, lest the wild animals overcome you". Surely G-d could have (as He did in the desert!) protected the people from wild animals as they quickly gained possession of the land. Yet such miracles would be "unnatural". This would not have been in the best interest of the people, who needed to discern G-d through "hidden miracles". The land of Israel was the land where the Jewish people would see the miraculous, despite its natural look. Or, to quote David ben Gurion, "In Israel, in order to be a realist, you must believe in miracles" (CBS Interview, October 1956).

Regardless of whether or not it would cause a sudden infestation of wild animals, it was important that the conquering of the land not come too easily. Only the things that require effort have meaning and permanence. "Three gifts G-d gave the Jewish people, and they all are only acquired through pain: Torah, the land of Israel and the world to come" (Brachot 5a). Building up the land is a monumental one, which we (thankfully) see being done successfully, before our very eyes. It has required much effort, and "according to the effort is the reward".

Twice a day, we accept the "yoke of commandments" as we recite the Shema. As a result of such acceptance, "You and your children will long endure on the land that G-d promised to your ancestors". 



I want to thank Joe Zeifman whose question to me this week inspired the above words.

Courtesy of Torah in Motion - www.torahinmotion.org
Volver al capítulo

גבורת הסוס

 

"לא בִגְבוּרַת הַסּוּס יֶחְפָּץ לא בְשׁוֹקֵי הָאִישׁ יִרְצֶה
רוֹצֶה ה' אֶת יְרֵאָיו אֶת הַמְיַחֲלִים לְחַסְדּוֹ" (י-יא) 

הסוס מסמל את הכח, ואת היכולת הצבאית. בפסוקים אלה, כמו במקומות רבים בתנ"ך, נאמר שהגברת הכח האנושי איננה רצויה בעיני ה', לעומת זאת יראת ה' והתלות בו הם הרצויים בעיניו.

הסוסים נחשבו ועדיין נחשבים לבעל חיים בעל מעמד גבוה והוסיפו ליוקרת בעליהם. פסוקי מקרא רבים מעידים על מעמדם הגבוה בהשוואה לבהמות המשא והרכיבה האחרות. התורה היתה צריכה להגביל את מספר הסוסים שהמלך רשאי להחזיק: "רַק לא יַרְבֶּה לּוֹ סוּסִים וְלֹא יָשִׁיב אֶת הָעָם מִצְרַיְמָה לְמַעַן הַרְבּוֹת סוּס וַה' אָמַר לָכֶם לא תסִפוּן לָשׁוּב בַּדֶּרֶךְ הַזֶּה עוֹד" (דברים י"ז, טז). עושרו של שלמה נמדד במספר הסוסים שהיו באורוותיו: "וַיְהִי לִשְׁלמה אַרְבָּעִים אֶלֶף אֻרְוֹת סוּסִים לְמֶרְכָּבוֹ וּשְׁנֵים עָשָׂר אֶלֶף פָּרָשִׁים" (מלכים א ה', ו). הסוס משמש כסמל למעמדם של שרים: "רָאִיתִי עֲבָדִים עַל סוּסִים וְשָׂרִים הֹלְכִים כַּעֲבָדִים עַל הָאָרֶץ" (קהלת י', ז).

הסוסים כבשו את מעמדם כנראה בזכות מהירותם ותפקידם בלחימה: "כִּי אֶת רַגְלִים רַצְתָּה וַיַּלְאוּךָ וְאֵיךְ תְּתַחֲרֶה אֶת הַסּוּסִים'" (ירמיהו י"ב, ה) או "שֶׁקֶר הַסּוּס לִתְשׁוּעָה וּבְרב חֵילוֹ לֹא יְמַלֵּט" (תהלים ל"ג, יז), "לא בִגְבוּרַת הַסּוּס יֶחְפָּץ לא בְשׁוֹקֵי הָאִישׁ יִרְצֶה" (תהלים קמ"ז, י). אביזרים המלווים את הסוס ראויים לקודש: "בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא יִהְיֶה עַל מְצִלּוֹת הַסּוּס קדֶשׁ לַה'..." (זכריה י"ד, כ). בגלל מעמדו הגבוה הסוס משמש כסמל להדגשת כוחו של הקב"ה. למרות כוחו וגבורתו של הסוס אין הוא עומד בפני ה': "סוּס מוּכָן לְיוֹם מִלְחָמָה ולַה' הַתְּשׁוּעָה" (משלי כ"א, לא), "כָּעֵת בַּמָּרוֹם תַּמְרִיא תִּשְׂחַק לַסּוּס וּלְרכְבו" (איוב ל"ט, יח). 


נערך ע"י צוות אתר התנ"ך

מתוך מאמרים בפורטל הדף היומי

Volver al capítulo

שבחי ירושלים

 

"שַׁבְּחִי יְרוּשָׁלַם אֶת ה' הַלְלִי אֱלֹהַיִךְ צִיּוֹן
 כִּי חִזַּק בְּרִיחֵי שְׁעָרָיִךְ בֵּרַךְ בָּנַיִךְ בְּקִרְבֵּךְ
" (יב-יג)

Volver al capítulo

ימלוך ה' לעולם

 

"... ה' אֹהֵב צַדִּיקִים
 ה' שֹׁמֵר אֶת גֵּרִים יָתוֹם וְאַלְמָנָה יְעוֹדֵד וְדֶרֶךְ רְשָׁעִים יְעַוֵּת
 יִמְלֹךְ ה' לְעוֹלָם אֱלֹהַיִךְ צִיּוֹן לְדֹר וָדֹר הַלְלוּיָהּ
" (ח-י)

Volver al capítulo

אל מול פני הרשע

Volver al capítulo

Pages

x